Anne Perry, Maureen Strickland, Owida Downey, Alvina Cain, Clarke Cromwell, Mia Rankin, Arthur Carter, Sharon Laframboise

Craig Walkington, Ross Cantwell, Larry Tench, Fred Connors

Call to Order - The meeting was called to order at 6:05pm.

Review of Notes from February 11th Meeting

Additions: Other individuals or organizations may, through the Chair, come to the meetings and make presentations like the one done by John Langley from the Cunard Steamship Historical Society.

Sharon will find out if the Canadian Environmental Assessment documents have been signed.

Action Items from Last meeting

a. Design Charette - Feedback, Review of Notes, Next Steps

Discussion took place around how the information was to be compiled and sent to HRM. It was mentioned that we need to keep "what goes on top" separate from the design of the building. We can only suggest or give ideas about what goes on top of the STP; however, the exterior design of the STP needs to take into consideration what potentially could go on top.

Common Themes: George Rogers Report was referred to. Discussion took place around other design ideas. Specifically, that the building should not look like something that it is not. Maybe a modern design should be considered. So far, all of the artist renderings have had historic overtones, and this may subconsciously influence what people think their design options are. If we could get drawings of modern design ideas it would give something for people to respond to. A modern look could be quite striking, it could incorporate functionality. It was felt that we should contemplate 2 design themes. Deference to history in a modern design. Not interested in fake imitation of historic nor are we interested in bad modern design. George Rogers will be invited to the next meeting.

Following needs to be added to the list of Common Themes: Garden and landscaping, parking, Community space.

It was agreed that we need to bring in an objective planner to explore the design and use possibilities as they relate to the location of the plant. For example, What are the possibilities for a building in the middle of an industrial area on a major thoroughfare. What is a rooftop good for? What are the site parameters that would preclude us from using some of the design ideas? All agreed that the design of the plant needs to meet two goals:

1. The roof top space should benefit the community; it must have a community focus; and

2. Mitigate the effect/impact of the STP on the community.

HRM will be asked to hire an urban planner. Frank Palermo from Dalhousie is a possibility. Sharon will contact him. The planner will be asked to review the ideas generated at the Charette, walk about the site, and then meet with us to share their thoughts/recommendations.

b. Election - Final Seat - Larry Tench acclaimed

Larry did not attend the charette, which was a requirement for his election to the position. He is not present tonight. Sharon will call him and ask him if he is committed to serving on the CLC. He will be informed that he must attend the next meeting of the CLC in order to maintain his seat.

Report of the CIF Sub-Committee

We will try to leverage additional money for the Strategic Plan from HRM. A direct link must be demonstrated between the plant and the community before HSSP will consider providing additional money. It was suggested that Maureen MacDonald should come to a future meeting to discuss effective ways for groups such as ours to advocate.

Other Business

a. Attendance by HRDC Representatives at next meeting

A representative from HRDC will be invited to the next meeting. Mia will contact Ross and Craig to come to the next meeting.

Next Meeting - Whole Committee March 10, 2003

Adjournment